Or: looks matter a lot less for men’s mating success (relative to all the other criteria they must meet to satisfy women’s 463 bullet-point checklist). As we can see, the two hottest girls are cleaning up in the attention whore sweepstakes. The plain jane got almost as many messages as the two hottest men combined. Finally, the results after four months: Holy mackerel! The next time you hear a feminist whine about the patriarchy, show her this graph and tell her where the real power resides. The ugliest man got nothing after four months of desperation.The two hottest men get a few bites, but because they are men and have no personal concept of the sheer volume of sexual attention that hot women experience during their brief window of prime fertility, they think they are Kings of Maine. The three men with looks ranging from ugly to above-average received a grand total of three messages over four months.The experiment: How many unsolicited messages do men get compared to women?
He created ten fake profiles, five men and five women of increasing physical attractiveness, and measured the response rate he received over a four-month period.
The results should be little surprise to regular guests of this mysterious sanctum sanctorum, but are worth examining in detail for the clarity they provide to men who are considering making online dating the fulcrum of their mate selection strategy.
For the second-hottest man, 1 in 10 women who viewed his profile sent him a message.
(Strangely, the putative hottest man got no messages.) Conclusion: Looks matter a lot more for women’s mating success. ” Exquisite Emma: “128.” Handsome Joe: 😯 Even more depressing for those above average-looking men who think they can bank on their decent looks to score pussy, the ugliest girl (that cow all the way over on the left) got one more message than the three men, from left to right, got in total.
Select the right websites: Keep in mind that it is important that you register yourself on the right website.